Are you ready for an exciting ride through shark-infested cornfields? Get ready, as "Sharks of the Corn" is here to give you a whirlwind of horror and comedy. Filmed by the legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra budget film draws inspiration from Stephen King's famous "Children of the Corn" (1984) and transforms it into a hilarious and bizarre humor satire that'll leave you looking around and squatting on the ground to laugh.
The Cornfield Carnival of Chaos
From the very first moment in a seemingly innocent cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" introduces the film's quirky nature. The film introduces Gary and Susan, two characters who rapidly fade away into the background while the movie drifts off in unexpected ways. The plot combines horror elements with an abundance of subplots, creating a delightful combo that's best called a cornfield carnival filled with chaos.
An Socially Psychopathic Shark Enthusiast
In comes Teddy Bo Lucas, a character who adds an extra twist to an unsettling storyline. This psychopathic shark enthusiast has the most bizarre obsession with these fish that inhabit the waters. And if that weren't bizarre enough, Teddy brings his love of sharks to another level when it is revealed that he has committed a murder in his motel room. This twist of surprise sets the stage for a wild ride of mystery and suspense.
Inconfusion Cults as well as Sharks
The plot becomes more intricate as authorities put the blame on Gary, a poor Gary for the murder of Susan, however, he is not the motive. In the meantime, a shark cult develops into a unique subplot. The story takes us to this world where cornfields, and shark worship collide. Then, just as you think there's no way to make things more absurd 2 bumbling thieves decide to steal a shark pup from this community. It's an unpredictable mix of funny and scary that will keep you on your toes.
Critiques as well as Comic Relief
Although "Sharks of the Corn" provides an original and refreshing entertainment, it's certainly not without its faults. It often jumps between several characters and scenes and some viewers are left confused in a struggle to comprehend several plotlines. It's a conscious choice of stylistic design and adds a spoof kind of film but it may not be everybody's cup of tea.
The production values of the film is intentionally low and the acting falls into the category of unreliable. However, amidst the sea with mediocre performances Steve Guynn shines through with his excellent performance. In fact, he is realizing his character instead of performing sentences. It's an exceptional example of genuine acting among a sea of inflated performances.
Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines
"Sharks of the Corn" shows its low-budget inclination with cheap effects that have some charm. Many of the sharks are hilariously presented by hand puppets. It adds an element of absurdity to the film. This bizarre plotline, which revolves around a shark cult's plan for reviving a legendary shark goddess, is where the movie fully unleashes its artistic flair. The problem is that this creative thinking often cannot translate into an immersive movie experience.
Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional
The one area in which "Sharks of the Corn" can be criticized is its cinematography. The frame and the visuals come seem a bit amateurish, and do not have the sharpness and elegance that you find at the top of popular horror films. While it's possible that this was done so that the film maintains a budget-conscious look however, it has a negative impact on the experience overall. experience.
It's a wrap "Sharks of the Corn" is a cult favorite. It's a slow and unengaging hodgepodge of scenes that can be hard to make sense (blog post) of. The low production quality in addition to the confusing plotlines and doubtful acting skills could deter people looking for a more elegant horror comedy. Even for those interested in entertaining films that aren't worth the time "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't deliver all the laughs you'd expected.Final Rating A single "Stock Footage Overlay" Out Five
Although the video itself is not of good quality, music, acting, and editing techniques "Sharks of the Corn" isn't up to the target. However, despite the possibility of a fantastically fun spoof film it ultimately fails to deliver a coherent and enjoyable overall experience. As the reviewer, I make a funny observation: movies, similar to corn, become (blog) more enjoyable in the event that you throw explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" fails to make the cut.